<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unabashed Virtual Server Lovefest</title>
	<link>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/</link>
	<description>a yeah yeah, i push models like weight</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/#comment-2828</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/#comment-2828</guid>
		<description>I'm not an expert on the product, but Virtual Server itself knows the difference between a physical and logical (core) processors. You can see this on the "Physical Computer Properties" screen. 

You can configure each instance to use up to (a max) of 100% of one physical CPU. There is no processor affinity. That is, VS will pool across all processors as it sees fit. This makes a lot of sense as there's no guarantees about what else is running on the host computer. 

It'd be nice to have a "Virtual Windows Server" SKU that's sole purpose in life was being a Host OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an expert on the product, but Virtual Server itself knows the difference between a physical and logical (core) processors. You can see this on the &#8220;Physical Computer Properties&#8221; screen. </p>
<p>You can configure each instance to use up to (a max) of 100% of one physical CPU. There is no processor affinity. That is, VS will pool across all processors as it sees fit. This makes a lot of sense as there&#8217;s no guarantees about what else is running on the host computer. </p>
<p>It&#8217;d be nice to have a &#8220;Virtual Windows Server&#8221; SKU that&#8217;s sole purpose in life was being a Host OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GC</title>
		<link>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>GC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>I have a question about Virtual Server 2005.  Does it see your 2 dual-core Xeons as 2 processors or four?  Can you allocate 1/2 of your total CPU time to a virtual machine, or just 1/4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about Virtual Server 2005.  Does it see your 2 dual-core Xeons as 2 processors or four?  Can you allocate 1/2 of your total CPU time to a virtual machine, or just 1/4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetKicks.com</title>
		<link>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetKicks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://laribee.com/blog/2007/01/10/unabashed-virtual-server-lovefest/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Virtual Server in the Development Shop...&lt;/strong&gt;

You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Virtual Server in the Development Shop&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
